Bibliographics

Author(s):

Centers for Disease Control,

Title:

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Survey Data. 2005 - 2010.

Source:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 2010, USA

Year:

2010

URL:

http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/

Language:

English (Australia, Canada, UK, USA)

Subject Classification

Subjects

Eligible for inclusion in findings archive

Eligible

Yes, included as study.

• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Adams County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Alabama 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Alabama 2005 /1
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Alameda County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Alaska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Allegheny County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Allen County, Indiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Anchorage, Alaska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Androscoggin County, Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Anne Arundel County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Anoka County, Minnesota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Arapahoe County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Arizona 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Arkansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Asotin County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Atlantic County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Baker County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Baltimore County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Baltimore, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Barnstable County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bay County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Beaufort County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Benton County, Arkansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Benton County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bergen County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Berkeley County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bernalillo County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bexar County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bonneville County, Idaho 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Boulder County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Brevard County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bristol County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bristol County, Rhode Island 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Broward County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Bucks County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Buncombe County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Burleigh County, North Dakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Burlington County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Butler County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cabarrus County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Caddo Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Calvert County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Camden County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cameron County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Campbell County, Wyoming 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Canadian County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Canyon County, Idaho 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cape May County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Carroll County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Carter County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cascade County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cass County, North Dakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Catawba County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cecil County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Charles County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Charleston, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Chelan County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cherokee County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cheshire County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Chittenden County, Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Citrus County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US City District of Queens, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US City district of The Bronx , New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Clackamas County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Clark County, Nevada 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Clark County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Clay County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Clayton County, Georgia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cleveland County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cobb County, Georgia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cochise County, Arizona 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Collier County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Collin County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Columbia County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Comanche County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Contra Costa County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cook County, Illinois 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Coos County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cumberland County, Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cumberland County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Cuyahoga County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Dakota County, Minnesota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Dakota County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Dallas County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Davidson County, Tennessee 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Davis County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US DeKalb County, Georgia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US DeSoto County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US DeSoto County, Mississippi 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Delaware 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Delaware County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Denton County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Denver, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US District of Columbia, District of Columbia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US District of Columbia, District of Columbia 2005 /1
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Dona Ana County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Dorchester County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Douglas County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Douglas County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Douglas County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US DuPage County, Illinois 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Durham, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Duval County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US El Paso County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US El Paso County, Colorado 2005 /1
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Erie County, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Escambia County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Essex County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Essex County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Fairbanks North Star, Alaska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Fairfield County, Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Fayette County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Flagler County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Flathead County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Forsyth County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Fort Bend County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Franklin County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Franklin County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Franklin County, Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Franklin County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Frederick County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Fremont County, Wyoming 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Fulton County, Georgia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Gadsden County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Gallatin County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Garfield County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Gaston County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Genesee County, Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Georgia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Gilchrist County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Gloucester County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Grafton County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Greenville County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Guilford County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Gwinnett County, Georgia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hall County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hamilton County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hamilton County, Tennessee 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hampden County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hampshire County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hardee County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Harford County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Harris County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Harrison County, Mississippi 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hartford County, Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hawaii 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hawaii County, Hawai 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Henderson County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hendry County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hennepin County, Minnesota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hernando County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hidalgo County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Highlands County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hillsborough County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hillsborough County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hinds County, Mississippi 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Honolulu, Hawai 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Horry County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Howard County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hudson County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Hunterdon County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Idaho 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Illinois 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Indiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Ingham County, Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Iowa 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jackson County, Missouri 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jackson County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jefferson County, Alabama 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jefferson County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jefferson County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jefferson County, Kentucky 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Jefferson Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Johnson County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Johnston County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kanawha County, West Virginia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kauai County, Hawai 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kennebec County, Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kent County, Delaware 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kent County, Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kent County, Rhode Island 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kentucky 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US King County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kings County, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kitsap County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Knox County, Tennessee 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Kootenai County, Idaho 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lake County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lake County, Illinois 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lake County, Indiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lancaster County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lane County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Laramie County, Wyoming 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Larimer County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Laurens County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Leavenworth County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lee County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lehigh County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Leon County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lewis and Clark County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lexington County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Licking County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lincoln County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Linn County, Iowa 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lorain County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Los Angeles County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lubbock County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Lucas County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Luzerne County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Macomb County, Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Madison County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Mahoning County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Manatee County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Maricopa County, Arizona 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Marion County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Marion County, Indiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Marion County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Martin County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Maui County, Hawai 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US McKinley County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Mercer County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Merrimack County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Miami, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Middlesex County, Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Middlesex County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Middlesex County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Midland County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Milwaukee County, Wisconsin 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Minnehaha County, South Dakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Minnesota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Missisippi 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Missoula County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Missouri 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Mobile County, Alabama 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Monmouth County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Monroe County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Monroe County, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Montgomery County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Montgomery County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Montgomery County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Montgomery, Alabama 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Morris County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Multnomah County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Nassau County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Nassau County, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Natrona County, Wyoming 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Nevada 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US New Castle County, Delaware 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US New Hanover County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US New Haven County, Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US New London County, Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US New York, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US NewHampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US NewJersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US NewMexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US NewYork 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Newport County, Rhode Island 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Nez Perce County, Idaho 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Norfolk County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US NorthCarolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US NorthDakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Northampton County, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Oakland County, Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Ocean County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Okeechobee County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Oklahoma County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Orange County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Orange County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Orange County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Orange County, Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Orangeburg County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Orleans Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Osceola County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Ottawa County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Palm Beach County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pasco County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Passaic County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pennington County, South Dakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Penobscot County, Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pierce County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pima County, Arizona 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pinal County, Arizona 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pinellas County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pittsburg County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Placer County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Plymouth County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Polk County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Polk County, Iowa 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Potter County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Prince George's County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Providence County, Rhode Island 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Puerto Rico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Pulaski County, Arkansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Queen Anne's County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Ramsey County, Minnesota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Randall County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Randolph County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Rankin County, Mississippi 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Rapides Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US RhodeIsland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Richland County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Riley County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Riverside County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Rockingham County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Rogers County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Rutland County, Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sacramento, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sagadahoc County, Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Salt Lake County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US San Bernardino County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US San Diego County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US San Francisco, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US San Juan County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US San Mateo County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sandoval County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Santa Clara County, California 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Santa Cruz County, Arizona 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Santa Fe County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Santa Rosa County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sarasota County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sarpy County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Scott County, Iowa 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sedgwick County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Seminole County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sequoyah County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Seward County, Nebraska 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Shawnee County, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Shelby County, Tennessee 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Silver Bow County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Skamania County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Smith County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Snohomish County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Somerset County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US SouthCarolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US SouthDakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Spartanburg County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Spokane, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US St. Johns County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US St. Louis County, Missouri 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US St. Louis, Missouri 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US St. Lucie County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Stark County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Stone County, Mississippi 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Strafford County, New Hampshire 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Suffolk County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Suffolk County, New York 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sullivan County, Tennessee 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Summit County, Ohio 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Summit County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sussex County, Delaware 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sussex County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Sweetwater County, Wyoming 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Tarrant County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Tennessee 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Thurston County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Tolland County, Connecticut 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Tooele County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Travis County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Tulsa County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Tuscaloosa County, Alabama 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Twin Falls County, Idaho 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Union County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Union County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Utah County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Val Verde County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Valencia County, New Mexico 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Vanderburgh County, Indiana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Virgin Islands 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Virginia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Volusia County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wagoner County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wake County, North Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wakulla County, Florida 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Ward County, North Dakota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Warren County, New Jersey 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wasatch County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Arkansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Maryland 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Minnesota 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Oklahoma 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Rhode Island 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washington County, Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Washoe County, Nevada 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wayne County, Michigan 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Webb County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Weber County, Utah 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Weld County, Colorado 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US WestVirginia 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Westchester County, New York-Newark-Bridgeport 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Westmoreland County, Rhode Island 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Westmoreland, Pennsylvania 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Whatcom County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wichita County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Will County, Illinois 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Williamson County, Texas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Windsor County, Vermont 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wisconsin 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Worcester County, Massachusetts 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wyandotte, Kansas 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Wyoming 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Yakima County, Washington 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Yamhill County, Oregon 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Yellowstone County, Montana 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US York County, Maine 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US York County, South Carolina 2005
• Centers for Disease Control (2010): study US Yuma County, Arizona 2005