# Correlational findings

## Study Timmermans (1997): study BY 1990

Public
18+ aged, general public, Belarus, 1990
Sample
Respondents
N = 1015
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

## Correlate

Authors's Label
Global health rating
Our Classification
Operationalization
Single question: "All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?" Would you say it is....
1   Very poor
2   Poor
3   Fair
4   Good
5   Very good

## Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = + 1       M=1.68      Mt=2.3
2       M=2.15      Mt=3.8
3       M=2.45      Mt=4.8
4       M=2.64      Mt=5.5
5       M=2.90      Mt=6.3
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = + 1       M=3.47      Mt=2.7
2       M=4.49      Mt=3.9
3       M=5.55      Mt=5.1
4       M=5.91      Mt=5.5
5       M=6.95      Mt=6.6
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = 1       M=-1.05     Mt=3.9
2       M=- .15     Mt=4.8
3       M=  .69     Mt=5.7
4       M= 1.44     Mt=6.4
5       M= 1.36     Mt=6.4
O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.25 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = +.22 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.27 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.17 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = +.14 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.19 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.26 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = +.23 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.27 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income