print

Correlational findings

Study Timmermans (1997): study PL 1989

Public:
18+ aged, general public, Poland, 1990
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 938
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

Correlate

Authors's label
Global health rating
Our Classification
Operationalization
Single question: "All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?" Would you say it is....
1   Very poor
2   Poor
3   Fair
4   Good
5   Very good

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a DM = + 1       M=2.62      Mt=5.4
2       M=2.74      Mt=5.8
3       M=2.96      Mt=6.5
4       M=3.06      Mt=6.9
5       M=3.17      Mt=7.2
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa DM = + 1       M=4.07      Mt=3.4
2       M=6.02      Mt=5.6
3       M=6.51      Mt=6.1
4       M=7.11      Mt=6.8
5       M=7.77      Mt=7.5
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a DM = 1       M=-.26      Mt=4.7
2       M=1.03      Mt=6.0
3       M=1.41      Mt=6.4
4       M=1.86      Mt=6.9
5       M=1.84      Mt=6.8
O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a r = +.25 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa r = +.26 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a r = +.21 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a tc = +.14 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa tc = +.17 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a tc = +.15 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a Beta = +.22 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa Beta = +.24 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a Beta = +.21 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income