# Correlational findings

## Study Timmermans (1997): study NO 1990

Public:
18+ aged, general public, Norway, 1990
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 1239
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

## Correlate

Authors's label
Global health rating
Our Classification
Operationalization
Single question: "All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?" Would you say it is....
1   Very poor
2   Poor
3   Fair
4   Good
5   Very good

## Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = + 1       M=3.03      Mt=6.8
2       M=3.07      Mt=6.9
3       M=3.05      Mt=6.8
4       M=3.17      Mt=7.2
5       M=3.38      Mt=7.9
O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = + 1       M=2.92      Mt=6.4
2       M=3.03      Mt=6.8
3       M=3.05      Mt=6.8
4       M=3.28      Mt=7.6
5       M=3.44      Mt=8.1
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = + 1       M=1.70      Mt=6.7
2       M=1.17      Mt=6.2
3       M=1.94      Mt=6.9
4       M=2.30      Mt=7.3
5       M=2.68      Mt=7.7
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = + 1       M=5.42      Mt=4.9
2       M=6.44      Mt=6.0
3       M=6.94      Mt=6.6
4       M=7.51      Mt=7.2
5       M=7.92      Mt=7.7
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = + 1       M=7.23      Mt=6.9
2       M=6.10      Mt=5.7
3       M=7.20      Mt=6.9
4       M=7.59      Mt=7.3
5       M=8.21      Mt=8.0
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.27 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.23 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.22 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.25 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.20 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.16 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.21 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.19 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.18 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.15 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.19 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.29 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income
O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.23 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.23 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.19 p < .001