# Correlational findings

## Study Timmermans (1997): study DK 1990

Public
18+ aged, general public, Denmark, 1990
Sample
Respondents
N =
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

## Correlate

Authors's Label
Global health rating
Our Classification
Operationalization
Single question: "All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?" Would you say it is....
1   Very poor
2   Poor
3   Fair
4   Good
5   Very good

## Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = + 1       M=2.38      Mt=4.6
2       M=3.04      Mt=6.8
3       M=3.20      Mt=7.3
4       M=3.31      Mt=7.7
5       M=3.51      Mt=8.4
O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.29 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = + 1       M=5.13      Mt=4.6
2       M=6.43      Mt=6.0
3       M=7.73      Mt=7.5
4       M=8.09      Mt=7.9
5       M=8.64      Mt=8.5
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = +.34 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = 1       M=-1.13      Mt=3.9
2       M=- .06      Mt=4.9
3       M= 1.52      Mt=6.5
4       M= 1.77      Mt=6.8
5       M= 2.47      Mt=7.5
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.37 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.19 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.25 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = +.21 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.24 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = +.31 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.39 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income