print

Correlational findings

Study Timmermans (1997): study LV 1990

Public
18+ aged, general public, Latvia, 1990
Sample
Respondents
N = 903
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

Correlate

Authors's Label
Global health rating
Our Classification
Operationalization
Single question: "All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?" Would you say it is....
1   Very poor
2   Poor
3   Fair
4   Good
5   Very good

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a DM = 1       Less than 10 Ss
2       M=2.27      Mt=4.2
3       M=2.47      Mt=4.9
4       M=2.73      Mt=5.8
5       M=2.72      Mt=5.7 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a DM = + 1       M=3.60      Mt=2.9
2       M=4.63      Mt=4.0
3       M=5.56      Mt=5.1
4       M=6.53      Mt=6.1
5       M=5.87      Mt=5.4 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a DM = 1       M= .00      Mt=5.0
2       M=-.02      Mt=5.0
3       M= .80      Mt=5.8
4       M=1.45      Mt=6.5
5       M=2.15      Mt=6.8 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a r = +.24 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a r = +.22 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a r = +.24 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a tc = +.17 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a tc = +.17 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a tc = +.17 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a Beta = +.21 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a Beta = +.24 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a Beta = +.26 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income