# Correlational findings

## Study Timmermans (1997): study LT 1990

Public:
18+ aged, general public, Lithuania, 1990
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 1000
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

## Correlate

Authors's label
Global health rating
Our Classification
Operationalization
Single question: "All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?" Would you say it is....
1   Very poor
2   Poor
3   Fair
4   Good
5   Very good

## Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = + 1       M=2.00      Mt=3.3
2       M=2.28      Mt=4.3
3       M=2.40      Mt=4.7
4       M=2.72      Mt=5.7
5       M=2.86      Mt=6.2
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = + 1       M=3.58      Mt=2.9
2       M=5.14      Mt=4.6
3       M=5.73      Mt=5.3
4       M=6.46      Mt=6.1
5       M=7.52      Mt=7.2
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = 1       M=-.08      Mt=4.9
2       M=-.41      Mt=4.6
3       M= .31      Mt=5.3
4       M=1.11      Mt=6.1
5       M=1.57      Mt=6.6
O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.30 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.26 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.30 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.22 p < .001 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.20 p < .001 A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.24 p < .001 O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a = +.26 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-aa = +.31 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.34 p < .001 ß controlled for sex, age, and household income