Study Peiro (2006): study ZZ 1995
- Public
- 16+ aged, general public, 16 nations, 1995
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 16000
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Marital status
- Our Classification
-
-
- Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- a: never married (reference)
b: maried
c: widowed
d: separated (=seperated or divorced)
Observed Relation with Happiness
b: married: OLRC = +.67 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC = +.43 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC = -.02 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.79 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.42 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.28 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.36 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.33 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.66 (05)
b: married: OLRC= +.08 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.30 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.75 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.12 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.49 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.56 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.53 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.25 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.39 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +1.40 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= +1.19 (05)
d: separated: OLRC= +.67 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= -.19 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.89 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.90 (05)
b: married: OLRC= +.33 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.46 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.73 (05)
b: married: OLRC= +.58 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.33 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.43 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.69 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= -1.02 (05)
d: separated: OLRC= -.65 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.55 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.84 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.78 (05)
b: married: OLRC= -.21 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.91 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.63 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.88 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.23 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.07 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.22 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.45 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.06 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.50 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.40 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= +.15 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.72 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.21 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.35 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.45 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.22 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.15 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= -.02 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.52 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.23 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.31 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.46 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.11 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.24 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.04 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.24 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.46 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.85 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.21 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.26 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.67 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.31 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.55 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.22 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.03 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.06 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.21 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.35 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.50 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.39 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.14 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.15 (05)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.05 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.77 (01)
b: married: OLRC= +.46 (ns)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.55 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.22 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.77 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= -.09 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= -.29 (ns)
b: married: OLRC= +.41 (01)
c: widowed: OLRC= +.51 (ns)
d: separated: OLRC= +.15 (ns)
OLRC controlled for:
-age
-health
-gender
-number of children
-size of town
-education
-labor market status
-income.
OLRC (Ordered Logit Regression Coefficient) cannot be interpreted as an absolute effect-size. The coefficients only denote relative differences in correlation and whether the correlations are negative or positive. E.g. correlations between being married and happiness are usually positive, but there are differences: the positive correlations are higher in Australia than in Finland or Chile.