print

Correlational findings

Study Selim (2008): study TR 1990

Public:
18+ aged, general public, Turkey, 1990-2001
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 6338
Non Response:
not reported
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's label
Importance of leisure time
Our Classification
Operationalization
Self report on single question about importance of leisure:
0 unimportance of leisure time (reference)
1 importance of leisure time

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = + p < .01 importance of leisure time (compared to unimportance of leisure time) O-HL-u-sq-v-4-a OLRC = + p < .01 importance of leisure time (compared to unimportance of leisure time)

OLRC's are controled for:
- year dummies
- gender
- age
- marital status
- number of childeren
- education level
- type of employment
- income scales
- health status
- importance of life domains
- political orientations and trust

OLRC's cannot be interpreted as absolute effect sizes. Values are therefore not reported in this abstract.