print

Correlational findings

Study Dijkstra et al. (2020): study ZZ 2017

Public
15+ aged, general public, 117 nations and territories, 2017 - 2019
Survey name
INT-Gallup World Poll combined waves
Sample
Respondents
N = 360000
Non Response
Assessment
Face-to-face + Telephone

Correlate

Authors's Label
rural living
Our Classification
Remarks
report focuses on urbanization, changed by WDH team to fit classification
Related specification variables
Operationalization
3: rural
2: town or semi-dense area
1: urban / city

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks C-BW-c-sq-l-11-c D% = percent "very happy" (scale 8 - 10)
LOW INCOME COUNTRIES
-rural: 14%
-town:  16%
-city:  17% C-BW-c-sq-l-11-c D% = percent "very happy" (scale 8 - 10)
LOWER MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES
-rural: 15%
-town:  17%
-city:  17% C-BW-c-sq-l-11-c D% = percent "very happy" (scale 8 - 10)
UPPER MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES
-rural: 18%
-town:  19%
-city:  22% C-BW-c-sq-l-11-c D% = percent "very happy" (scale 8 - 10)
HIGH INCOME COUNTRIES
-rural: 24%
-town:  26%
-city:  28%