print

Correlational findings

Study Cropanzano & James (1993): study US 1990 /1

Public:
Pathology laboratory personnel, United States, 1990
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 198
Non Response:
12%
Assessment:
Multiple assesment methods
questionnaire and rating by supervisor

Correlate

Authors's Label
Performance
Our Classification
Remarks
Konovsky & Fogel (1988)
Distribution
M = 3.78; SD = 0.40
Operationalization
According to the annual evaluation of the organization based on 5 performance dimensions and 2 ratings on global job accountability and on success in attaining quarterly performance goals.
Items not reported, rating scale not reported.
Ratings were averaged to produce the overall performance evaluation.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BW-g-mq-v-5-a r = + ? - positive affect: r = +.30 (ns)
- negative affect: r = -.26 (ns)
Correlation with affect balance not reported, but must be positive, significance undetermined
A-BW-g-mq-v-5-a Beta = ? ? positive affect: beta = +.06 (ns)
negative affect: beta not reported
Correlation with affect balance not reported, direction unclear

Beta controled for:
- organizational commitment
- turnover intention
A-BW-g-mq-v-5-a = +.08 p < .05 Additional 8% variance in job performance explain after
- tenure