print

Correlational findings

Study Wright & Cropanzano (1998): study US 1995

Public:
Social welfare workers, USA, followed 1 year,1995
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 52
Non Response:
19%
Assessment:

not reported

Correlate

Authors's Label
Job performance
Our Classification
Remarks
All respondents were rated by the same supervisor
Distribution
M = 4.0; SD = 0.7
Operationalization
Question for the administrative officer:
- Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance over the last six months?
1; poor
:
5; excellent

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BW-g-mq-v-5-a r = 0 ns Positive affect: r = -.04(ns)
Negative affect: r = -.12(ns)
Correlation with affect balance not reported, but must be nil and insignificant