Study Beaman (2010): study CA 2005
- Public
- Recent retirees, Canada, followed 1 year, 200/-200/
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 327
- Non Response
- T1:26,8%, T2:12,8%
- Assessment
-
Interview: face-to-face
completed questionnaires at Concordia University T2: 12 months after T1
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Retirement satisfaction
- Our Classification
-
-
- Error Estimates
- Internal consistency study 1: alpha= .84 study 2: alpha: T1 = .81, T2= .82
- Remarks
- Two questions from the Retirement Satisfaction Inventory (Floyd et al, 1992)
- Distribution
-
T1: M=5,06, SD=0,95
T2: M=5.09, SD=0.81 - Operationalization
- overall, how satisfied they were currently with their retirement, and how their life since retirement compares to their life before retirement.
5 very satisfied, much better
4
3
2
1 very dissatisfied, much worse
Observed Relation with Happiness
PA: Beta= +.59 (01)
NA: Beta= -.45 (01)
Correlation with ABS not reported, but must be positive and significant
Beta controlled for T1:
- age
- health
- finances
- duration retired
- gender
- emotional awareness
- positive interactions
- negative interactions
- perceived availability of support
- perceived satisfaction with support
PA: Beta= +.56 (01)
NA: Beta= -.33 (01)
Correlation with ABS not reported, but must be positive and significant
Beta with T2 happiness controlled for
- T1 happiness (to capture change)
- T2 health
- T2 finances
- T1 gender
- T1 emotional awareness
- T1 positive interactions
- T2 positive interactions
- T1 negative interactions
- T2 negative interactions
- T1 perceived satisfaction with support
- T2 perceived satisfaction with support