print

Correlational findings

Study Beaman (2010): study CA 2005

Public
Recent retirees, Canada, followed 1 year, 200/-200/
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 327
Non Response
T1:26,8%, T2:12,8%
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face
completed questionnaires at Concordia University T2: 12 months after T1

Correlate

Authors's Label
Retirement satisfaction
Our Classification
Error Estimates
Internal consistency study 1: alpha= .84 study 2: alpha: T1 = .81, T2= .82
Remarks
Two questions from the Retirement Satisfaction Inventory (Floyd et al, 1992)
Distribution
T1: M=5,06, SD=0,95
T2: M=5.09, SD=0.81
Operationalization
overall, how satisfied they were currently with their retirement, and how their life since retirement compares to their life before retirement.
5 very satisfied, much  better
4
3
2
1 very dissatisfied, much worse

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BW-cm-mq-v-5-e Beta = + s T1 happiness by T1 retirement satisfaction

PA: Beta= +.59 (01)
NA: Beta= -.45 (01)
Correlation with ABS not reported, but must be positive and significant

Beta controlled for T1:
- age
- health
- finances
- duration retired
- gender
- emotional awareness
- positive interactions
- negative interactions
- perceived availability of support
- perceived satisfaction with support
A-BW-cm-mq-v-5-e Beta = + s T1-T2 CHANGE in happiness by T2 retirement satisfaction
 
PA: Beta= +.56 (01)
NA: Beta= -.33 (01)
Correlation with ABS not reported, but must be positive and significant
 
Beta with T2 happiness controlled for
- T1 happiness (to capture change)
- T2 health
- T2 finances
- T1 gender
- T1 emotional awareness
- T1 positive interactions
- T2 positive interactions
- T1 negative interactions
- T2 negative interactions
- T1 perceived satisfaction with support
- T2 perceived satisfaction with support