Study Avery (2010): study US 2005
- Public
- Working population, USA, 2005
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 541
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Coworker racioethnic dissimilarity
- Our Classification
-
-
- Distribution
- Mean = 3,52, SD = 1,87
- Operationalization
- Participants are asked to indicate the proportion of individuals at work with whom they interact who are of a different racioethnic group than their own.
Observed Relation with Happiness
- age
- education
- income
- gender
- ethnicity
- racioethnic prejudice.
- age
- education
- income
- gender
- ethnicity.
- interaction between ethnicity (black - hispanic,and coworker racioethnic dissimilarity.
b = 0,46 for Black x Racial dissimilarity
b = 0,58 for Hispanic x Racial dissimilarity
Racioethnicity moderated the relationship between racioethnic dissimilarity and life satisfaction with the linkage being
positive for minority respondents and negative for majority respondents.(see picture)