print

Correlational findings

Study Huang & Humphreys (2010): study US 2005 /1

Public:
18+ aged, general public, United States of America, 2005 - 2009
Survey name:
US-BRFSS 2005-09
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 1589266
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: telephone (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Percent population in urban areas in county
Our Classification
Remarks
Data County Business Patterns reports 2005-2007
Distribution
Range= 0-100  M= 81.34  SD=22,52
Operationalization
Percent population in urban areas

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLu-g-sq-v-4-e Beta = -4.5 ns Beta controled for
- individual characteristics
  -income
  - sexe
  - age
  - education
  - marital status
  - employment status
  - ethnicity
- county characteristics
  - population dessity
  -Median household income
  - %Population per square mile land
  - % ownner occupied hpusing
  - % black population
  - % hispanic population
  - % all minirity
  - sports facilities in county