print

Correlational findings

Study Nurdinova & Adacy (2020): study TR 1990

Public
15+ aged women, Turkey, 1990-2011
Survey name
INT-World Values Survey, pooled waves
Sample
Respondents
N = 3848
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Marital status
Our Classification
Remarks
Maried was rederence in the report. Referenve changed to unmarried to fit WDH classification. Signs of correlation were reverserved accordingly
Distribution
single M=0,18 SD=0,38
widowed M=0,06 SD=0,23
separated M=0,005 SD=0,07
divorced M=0,02 SD=0,13
living with a partner M=0,003 SD=0,05
married M=0,74 SD=0,44
Operationalization
1 :  Married
0:  Not married (reference)
     0a Living with a partner
     0b Single
     0c Widowed/divorced/separated

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.38 p < .55 Married   (vs Living with a partner) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.64 p < .01 Married   (vs single) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.40 p < .01 Married   (vs Widowed/divorced/separated)

OLRCs controled for:
-age
-age squared
-number of children
-income scale
-education level
-years
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.41 p < .52 Married   (vs Living with a partner) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.44 p < .01 Married   (vs Single) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.39 p < .01 Married   (vs Widowed/divorced/separated)

OLRCs additionally controled for:
-employment status
O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.37 p < .56 Married   (vs Living with a partner) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.43 p < .01 Married   (vs Single) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OLRC = +.38 p < .01 Married   (vs Widowed/divorced/separated)

OLRCs additionally controled for:
-religion