Study Pierewan & Tampubolon (2014a): study ZZ Europe 2002
- Public
- 16+ aged general public, EU nations, 2004- 2010
- Survey name
- EU-ESS 1-4: 2002-2010
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 100000
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Frequency internet use
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Recoded: 0 no use (0+1) reference 1 rarely (2+3) 2 medium (4+5) 3 frequent (5+6)
- Distribution
-
2004 2006 2008 2010
% No user 56 49 47 39
% Rare user 4 4 3 2
% Medium user 9 8 6 6
% Frequent user 31 39 44 53 - Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- Selfreport on single question: How often do you use internet, the World Wide Web or e-mail for your personal use, whether at home or work?
0 no access at home or work
1 never
2 less than once a month
3 onece a month
4 several times a month
5 one a week
6 several times a week
7 every day
Recoded into 3 dummy variables:
3 Frequent ('several times a week' and 'every day')
2 Medium ('several times a month' and 'every day')
1 Rare ('less than once a month' and 'once a month')
0 Never ('no access at home' and 'never use the internet')
Observed Relation with Happiness
- 2004 b = -.10 (ns)
- 2006 b = -.13 (ns)
- 2008 b = +.18 (05)
- 2010 b = +.21 (05)
- 2004 b = -.01 (ns)
- 2006 b = -.06 (ns)
- 2008 b = +.12 (05)
- 2010 b = +.08 (ns)
- 2004 b = -.04 (ns)
- 2006 b = -.06 (ns)
- 2008 b = +.08 (05)
- 2010 b = +.11 (01)
b controlled for:
- employement
- unemployed
- retired
- homemaker
- disabeled
- social life
- social contacts
- social support
- trust
- health
- socio-demographics
- age
- sexe
- education
- income
- marital status
- occupation professional
- regional characteristics
- internet dessity
- unemployement rate
Similar results obtained with a logistic regression