print

Correlational findings

Study Averina, M. et al. (2005): study RU Archangelsk 1999

Public:
15+ aged general public, Arkhangelsk, Russia, 2000
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 3705
Non Response:
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper
A six page questionnaire with 111 questions was administered

Correlate

Authors's label
Unsatisfied with nutrition
Our Classification
Operationalization
Selfreport on single question:
How do you evaluate your nutrition?
-  good
- satisfactory
-  poor
0 good, satisfactory
1 poor

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks C-BW-c-sq-l-11-c OR = 3.8 p < .000 Unhappiness by Unsatisfied with nutriton CI(3.1-4.7)
Control variables not reported