print

Correlational findings

Study Cropanzano & James (1993): study US 1990

Public:
Female nurses, United States, 1990
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 97
Non Response:
Assessment:
Multiple assesment methods
Questionnaire and rating by supervisor

Correlate

Authors's Label
Performance
Our Classification
Remarks
performance data only available for 35 nurses
Distribution
M = 123.06; SD = 15.75
Operationalization
Based on the annual performance evaluation of the hospital which was taken on a multidimensional graphic ratings scale, items not reported.

Rated: 1-170

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BW-g-mq-v-5-a r = + ns positive affect: r = +.20 (ns)
negative affect: r = +.00 (ns)

Correlation with affect balance not reported, but will be positive but non-significant.
A-BW-g-mq-v-5-a = + ? Additional variance in job performance explained after
- organizational commitment
- turnover intentions

positive affect +15% (01)
negative affect (ns)

R2 for affect balance not reported, but still be positive. Significance undetermined.

Relation mediated by Organizational commitment.