print

Correlational findings

Study Fischer (2008a): study ZZ 1997

Public:
18+ aged general public, 60 nations, 1997-2001
Survey name:
INT-WorldValuesSurvey 3
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 79064
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's label
Income level
Our Classification
Operationalization
Deciles
1 lowest (reference)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 highest

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Special Research Type Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.10 p < .01 none Income level 2 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.17 p < .01 none Income level 3 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.29 p < .01 none Income level 4 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.36 p < .01 none Income level 5 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.44 p < .01 none Income level 6 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.50 p < .01 none Income level 7 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.51 p < .01 none Income level 8 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.56 p < .01 none Income level 9 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a OPRC = +.69 p < .01 none Income level 10 vs income level 1 O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = none Stronger in nations with more market competition. Similar among males and females. O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-a = none Interaction with competition differs not very much with income level.