print

Correlational findings

Study Shu & Zhu (2009): study CN 2006

Public:
20-69 aged, general public, China, 2006
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 2000
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's label
Age cohort
Our Classification
Operationalization
Age cohort
   20-29  (reference group)
1. 30-39
2. 40-49
3. 50-59
4. 60-69

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-c-sq-v-5-m OR = 0.72 ns Age 30-39  (vs 20-29) O-HL-c-sq-v-5-m OR = 0.64 p < .05 Age 40-49  (vs 20-29) O-HL-c-sq-v-5-m OR = 0.71 ns Age 50-59  (vs 20-29) O-HL-c-sq-v-5-m OR = 0.98 ns Age 60-69  (vs 20-29) M-FH-c-sq-v-4-b OR = 1.17 ns Age 30-39  (vs 20-29) M-FH-c-sq-v-4-b OR = 0.98 ns Age 40-49  (vs 20-29) M-FH-c-sq-v-4-b OR = 1.24 ns Age 50-59  (vs 20-29) M-FH-c-sq-v-4-b OR = 0.94 ns Age 60-69  (vs 20-29) C-W-u-sq-v-4-c OR = 1.16 ns Age 30-39  (vs 20-29) C-W-u-sq-v-4-c OR = 0.86 ns Age 40-49  (vs 20-29) C-W-u-sq-v-4-c OR = 1.1 ns Age 50-59  (vs 20-29) C-W-u-sq-v-4-c OR = 1.08 ns Age 60-69  (vs 20-29) M-ACO---mq-v-7-a b = -.04 ns Age 30-39  (vs 20-29) M-ACO---mq-v-7-a b = -.16 ns Age 40-49  (vs 20-29)
Subgroup value is lower.
M-ACO---mq-v-7-a b = +.06 ns Age 50-59  (vs 20-29) M-ACO---mq-v-7-a b = +.20 ns Age 60-69  (vs 20-29) M-ACO---mq-v-7-a = OR and B are versus reference group.

OR and B controled for
- gender
- education
- marital status
- household income
- unemployement
- urban residency
- domain satisfaction
- value priorities
- lifestyle
M-ACO---mq-v-7-a = For a subgroup of 87% of respondents with at least one positive experience of happiness, enjoyment and accomplishment, OR and B values are higher unless stated otherwise.