Study Zijlmans (2009): study DE 1998 /1
- Public
- Unemployed, 21-64 aged, Germany, 1998-1999
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 1975
- Non Response
- not reported
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Importance of leisure for well-being
- Our Classification
-
-
- Error Estimates
- T1-T2 correlation .37 for individuals who became unemployed and .29 for individuals who become reemployed between periods
- Distribution
-
Both periods
N= 1:491 2:1270 3:204
%= 1:24,99, 2:64,60 3:10,41 - Operationalization
- Self report on the question how important leisure is for their well-being and contentment:
3: Very important
2: Important
1: Less important or not important at all
Observed Relation with Happiness
Important: M=5,92 SD=1,94
Less/not important: M=5,08 SD=2,07