Study Bjornskov et al. (2008a): study ZZ 1997
- Public
- 18+ aged, general public, 66 nations, 1997-2001
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 62295
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Fiscal decentralization
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Indicators obtained from the World Bank's fiscal indicators averaged over the period 1980-2000 to capture long term effects (page 5)
- Distribution
-
A: range: -22,69 to 31,21, SD: 12,89
B: range: -18.33 to 33,00 , SD: 12,59
C: range: -33,91 to 57,07, SD: 20
D: range: -42,05 to 33,94, SD: 19,23 - Operationalization
- A Spending decentralization: Share of sub-federal spending in general spending
B Revenue decentralization: Share of sub-federal revenue in general revenue
C Transfer dependence: Share of transfers to sub-national governments from other government levels in total sub-national revenues (including grants)
D Own tax sources: Ratio of sub-national tax revenue to total sub-national revenues
Observed Relation with Happiness
Spending decentralization
Beta's controlled for:
- nation characteristics
- infant mortality
- years of independence
- religiousness
- bi-cameral system (vs not)
- openness of the economy
- post-communist (vs not)
- part of the world
- government consumption
- individual characteristics
- age
- gender
- education
- marital status
- occupation
- income
- religion
- voluntary work