# Correlational findings

## Study Lepper (1998): study US California 1993

Public
Retirees, Southern California, USA, followed 9 months199?
Sample
Respondents
N = 971
Non Response
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Mailed questionnaire

## Correlate

Authors's Label
Other reports for SWB measures
Our Classification
Operationalization
Other(by spouse or close friend/relative) reports of happiness (using the same question as used for self reports)

## Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-*-mq-v-16-a = 0,02 ns    Self rating           Other rating
T1 M = 1.22    SD = 0,26 M = 1.24
O-HL-*-mq-v-16-a = +.08 p < .001    Self rating           Other rating
T2 M = 1.28    SD = 0,03 M = 1.29 (verschil in M klopt niet)
O-HL-*-mq-v-16-a = +.59 p < .0001 T1 self rating by T1 other rating O-HL-*-mq-v-16-a = +.54 p < .0001 T2 self rating by T2 other rating A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = -.05 p < .001    Self rating          Other rating
T1 M = 0,59    SD = 0.41 M = 0,64
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.00 ns    Self rating           Other rating
T2 M = 0,65    SD = 0,03 M = 0,67
A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.53 p < .0001 T1 self rating by T1 other rating A-BB-cm-mq-v-2-a = +.47 p < .0001 T2 self rating by T2 other rating M-AO-*-mqr-*-*-a = -.13 p < .05 SD= 1.71 M-AO-*-mqr-*-*-a = +.08 ns SD = 0,08 M-AO-*-mqr-*-*-a = +.64 p < .0001 T1 self rating by T1 other rating M-AO-*-mqr-*-*-a = +.57 p < .001 T2 self rating by T2 other rating