print

Correlational findings

Study Cha (2003): study KR 1998

Public:
College students, Korea, 199?
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 350
Non Response:
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper
Questionnaire completed in class

Correlate

Authors's label
Collective self-esteem
Our Classification
Operationalization
Ss were asked to think of the ascribed social categories to which they belong, such as sex, gender and religion. They  then rated:
A How good they feel about these categories (private collective esteem)
B How good they think that others evaluate these categories (public collective self esteem)
C How worthy they feel as members of these categories (membership esteem)
D How important membership is to their selfesteem (importance to identity)

Ratings made on a 6-point Likert scale

Korean Collective Self-esteem Scale. (Kim 1994; Luhtanen & Croker 1992)

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BD2-cm-mq-v-7-b r = +.41 p < .01