Study Cha (2003): study KR 1998
- Public
- College students, Korea, 199?
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 350
- Non Response
- Assessment
-
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Questionnaire completed in class
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Collective self-esteem
- Our Classification
-
-
- Error Estimates
- alpha=.85
- Operationalization
- Ss were asked to think of the ascribed social categories to which they belong, such as sex, gender and religion. They then rated:
A How good they feel about these categories (private collective esteem)
B How good they think that others evaluate these categories (public collective self esteem)
C How worthy they feel as members of these categories (membership esteem)
D How important membership is to their selfesteem (importance to identity)
Ratings made on a 6-point Likert scale
Korean Collective Self-esteem Scale. (Kim 1994; Luhtanen & Croker 1992)