Van Agteren et al. (2021a): study AU 2016
Publication
- Author(s):
- Van Agteren, J.; Bartholomaeus, J.; Gerace, A.; Lo, L.; Steains, E.
- Title:
- Using a Technology‑Based Meaning and Purpose Intervention to Improve Well‑being: A Randomised Controlled Study
- Source:
- Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, Vol. 22, 3571 - 3591
Investigation
- Public
- Participants in a meaning training,,Australia and New Zealand, 202?
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Non-probability self-selected
- Respondents
- N = 413
- Non Response
- 280
- Assessment
- Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)
Happiness Measure(s) and Distributional Findings
- Full text:
-
Self report on 20 questions.
Indicate to what extend you felt this way in the last week.
A nervous
B distressed
C afraid
D edgy
E grouchy
F upset
G scared
H ashamed
I guilty
J hostile
K excited
L active
M determined
N inspired
O enthusiastic
P alert
Q attentive
R proud
S emotionally strong
T interested
Answer options:
1 very slightly or not at all
2 a little
3 moderately
4 quite a bit
5 extremely
Negative affect score (NAS): A to J
Positive affect score (PAS): K to T
Affect Balance Score (ABS): PAS - NAS
Name: Watson et al's PANAS (adapted last week version for children) - Classification:
- A-BW-cw-mq-v-5-b
- Author's label:
- PANAS
- Page in publication:
- 3597
- Full text:
-
Self report on single question:
In the past several hours, I have been satisfied with my life
1 strongly disagree
2
3
4
5
6
7: strongly agree - Classification:
- O-SLu-mh-sqr-n-7-a
- Author's label:
- Life satisfaction
- Remarks:
- T1 Affect balance computed by WDH team substracting NA from PA
- Page in publication:
- 3579
- Full text:
-
Self report on feeling during three randomly selected activities that had occurred during the day
.. Felt happy … (full text not reported)
0 not at all happy
1
2
3
4
5
6 very happy
Kind of rating scale not reported - Classification:
- A-AA-md-mqr-?-7-a