print

Correlational findings

Study Pokasova (2002): study SK 2000

Public
60-94 aged in pensioners homes, Slovakia, 2002
Sample
Respondents
N = 101
Non Response
?
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Accomodating Flexibility
Our Classification
Remarks
Seniors with medium Accommodating Flexibility Scores (N=68) were not used for analysis.
Distribution
1:  N=17, 2, N=16
Operationalization
Accommodating Flexibility: was assessed with : Brandstatters Tenacity-Flexibility Goaloriented Scale. This questionnaire consisted of two subscales (tenacity and flexibility) of 15 items each. Both subscales were combined in one T-F score. Items were rated on a 5-point scale.

1. Low Accomodating Flexibility (LAF
2. High Accommodating Flexibility (HAF

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-QOL-cw-sq-v-5-b DM = + p < .044 Low Accommodating Flexibility:  M = 2.8
High Accommodating Flexibility: M = 3.3