### Correlational finding on Happiness and Change community sizeSubject code: L13aa01a

 Study Cantril (1965): study IL 1961 Title The Pattern of Human Concern. Source Rutgers University Press, 1965, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA Public 20+ aged general public, Israel, 1961-62 Sample Non-Response - Respondents N = 1170

 Correlate Author's label Region Page in Source 369 Our classification Change community size, code L13aa01a Operationalization ```a: Coop. settlement b: new urban c: long settled urban d: Tel Aviv, Haifa e: Jerusalem ```

 Observed Relation with Happiness HappinessMeasure Statistics Elaboration/Remarks C-BW-c-sq-l-11-a DMt= ```Coop. settlement : Mt = 5.3 New urban : Mt = 4.5 Long settled urban : Mt = 5.5 Tel-Aviv, Haifa : Mt = 5.5 Jerusalem : Mt = 5.5 ```

Appendix 1: Happiness measures used
 Code Full Text C-BW-c-sq-l-11-a Selfreport on single question:Here is a picture of a ladder. Suppose we say that the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom represents the worst possible life for you. Where on the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time? [ 10 ] best possible life[ 9 ] [ 8 ][ 7 ][ 6 ][ 5 ][ 4 ][ 3 ][ 2 ][ 1 ][ 0 ] worst possible life Preceded by 1) open questions about what the respondent imagines as the best possible life and the worst possible life. 2) ratings on the ladder of one's life five years ago and where on the ladder one expects to stand five years from now.Name: Cantril's self anchoring ladder rating of life (original)

Appendix 2: Statistics used
 Symbol Explanation DMt DIFFERENCE of MEANS AFTER TRANSFORMATIONType: descriptive statistic only. Measurement level: Correlate: dichotomous, Happiness: metricTheoretical range: [-10; +10]Meaning: the difference of the mean happiness (happiness measured at a 0-10 rating scale) between the two correlate levels.
Source:
Ruut Veenhoven, World Database of Happiness, Collection of Correlational Findings, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
https://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl