print

Correlational findings

Study Hsieh (2012a): study US 2007

Public
Frail older adults in the USA,, 200?
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 112
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Composite domain satisfactions
Our Classification
Remarks
4 clusters of importance ratings were derived by hierarchical dendogram analysis
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Rating of 7 life domains on
A  satisfaction
B  perceived importance
- religion
- friendships
- finances
- spare time
- family life
- neighbourhood
- health

Both A and B rated on 7 step verbal reponse scale

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-?-sq-v-7-a r = +.81 cluster 1: "less religious" people(N=19)

Correlation of happiness and summed domain satisfaction in 4 importance clusters
O-SLW-?-sq-v-7-a r = +.49 cluster 2: "average" people(N=17)

Correlation of happiness and summed domain satisfaction in 4 importance clusters
O-SLW-?-sq-v-7-a r = +.42 cluster 3: "all important" people (N=46)

Correlation of happiness and summed domain satisfaction in 4 importance clusters
O-SLW-?-sq-v-7-a r = +.51 cluster 4: "independent" people(N=30)

Correlation of happiness and summed domain satisfaction in 4 importance clusters