print

Correlational findings

Study Cruces et al. (2008): study AR 2007

Public
Adults, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2007
Survey name
IR-National Survey QOL
Sample
Respondents
N = 1000
Non Response
not reported
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Education level
Our Classification
Operationalization
4 on educationlevel selected neighborhoods with successive education levels.
Neighborhood 1, lowest level, has the highest percentage of primary education only; neighborhoos 4, highest education level, has the highest percentage of tertiary education.

1: Primary education only
2: Secundary education
3:Tertiary education

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLu-g-sq-n-10-c DM = + DM calculated from average happiness of the 2 highest education levels compared to the average happiness of the 2 lowest education levels.
Mean happiness:
Highest education(Palermo)              M=7.88
2nd highest education(Caballito)        M=8.00
3rd highest education level(S.Cristobal)M=7.68
Lowest education level(Avellaneda)      M=7.59