Study Veenhoven (1984): study ZZ 1974 /1
- Public
- 15+ aged, general public, 14 nations and regions, 1974-1976
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 6563
- Non Response
- Assessment
-
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Conducted by Gallup bureaus in different countries.
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Liberal democracy
- Our Classification
-
-
- Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- Degree to which the political reality in the various countries matched the ideal of a parliamentary democracy, based on the following indicators:
1. the constitutional status of the
regime;
2. separation between legislative and
executive powers;
3. freedom of press;
4. freedom of opposition;
5. free elections;
6. representativeness of the regime;
7. absence of bans on any political
party;
8. existence of a multi party system;
9. actual interest articulation by
political parties;
10. actual interest integration in the
parliament;
11. legislative influence of the
parliament;
12. dominance of the political leader
in the country;
13. relative dominance of the biggest
party;
14. possibilities of opposition and
coalitions;
15. absence of restrictions for
minority groups.
Data drawn from Bertand (1981:162).
Observed Relation with Happiness
democracy
Australia 7.0 40.5
USA 6.7 38.5
Canada 7.0 37.5
Great Britain 6.8 39.5
France 5.8 35.5
W-Germany 6.6 37.5
Italy 5.6 39.5
Benelux 6.0 43.1
Scandinavia 7.6 42.2
Brasil 6.2 35.5
Mexico 6.2 25.0
Africa (South
of the Sahara) 4.6 9.3
India 3.4 36.0
Japan 5.8 38.5