print

Correlational findings

Study Tani et al. (2020): study AU 2001

Public
Elderly, Australia, 2001
Survey name
AU-HILDA combined waves
Sample
Respondents
N = 5881
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Household size
Our Classification
Distribution
Natives      M=1.81 SD=0.73
Migrants     M=1.94 SD=0.8
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Self report on question: How many of these children live in this household at least 50% of the time?

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-d Beta = -.05 ns ALL

Beta controlled for:
- Age
- Age squared
- Sexe: male
- Married
- Education
- Physical health
- Mental health
- Ln income
- Has children
- Ethnic concentration
- Social network O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-d Beta = -.02 ns Beta additionally controlled forcountry of origin O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-d Beta = -.04 ns NATIVES Only

Beta controlled for:
- Age
- Age squared
- Gender: male
- Married
- Education
- Physical health
- Mental health
- Ln income
- Has children
- Social network O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-d Beta = +.01 ns MIGRANTS Only

Beta controlled for:
- Age
- Age squared
- Gender: male
- Married
- Education
- Physical health
- Mental health
- Ln income
- Has children
- Social network O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-d Beta = -.03 ns FEMALES Only

Beta controlled for:
- Age
- Age squared
- Married
- Education
- Physical health
- Mental health
- Ln income
- Has children
- Social network
- Germany
- Netherlands
- Italy
- Vietnam
- Philippines
- China
- India
- English speaking countries O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-d Beta = -.01 ns MALES Only

Beta controlled for:
- Age
- Age squared
- Married
- Education
- Physical health
- Mental health
- Ln income
- Has children
- Social network
- Germany
- Netherlands
- Italy
- Vietnam
- Philippines
- China
- India
- English speaking countries