print

Correlational findings

Study Lai et al. (2019): study US Chicago 2011

Public
60+ aged Chinese migrants, Chicago, USA, 2011 - 2013
Survey name
US-PINE
Sample
Respondents
N = 2717
Non Response
4.26%
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Income
Our Classification
Remarks
N=2818
Distribution
Range is 1-10, M: 1.9, SD: 1.1
Operationalization
Self report on question:  Just give me the letter that represents your income category? 1: Q
2: R
3: S
4: T
5: U
6: V
7: W
8:  X
9: Y
10: Z
88: DK
99: RF

Respondents were told to “Include income from all sources, such as wages, salaries, social security or retirement benefits, help from relative, rent from property, and so forth.

1 represents the lowest level of income, and 10 represents the highest level of income.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-QOL-u-sq-n-4-c Beta = +.04 p < .001 Beta controlled for:
- Age
- Education
- Number of children alive
- Number of household members
- Number of years in the United States
- Live with the family member
- Talking with the family member
- Closeness with the family member
- Entrusting in healthcare decisions
- Positive support from friends
O-QOL-u-sq-n-4-c Beta = +.02 p < .05 Beta additionally controlled for:
- Sense of control
- Live with the family member x support from friends
- Talking with the family member x support from friends
- Closeness with the family member x support from friends
− Entrusting in healthcare
decisions x support from friends