Study Guo et al. (2019): study US Chicago 2011
- Public
 - 60+aged Chinese migrants, Chicago, USA, 2011 - 2013
 - Survey name
 - US-PINE
 - Sample
 - Respondents
 - N = 3138
 - Non Response
 - 0.6%
 - Assessment
 - 
        Interview: face-to-face                    
Interviews were conducted at respondents’ homes by bilingual interviewers. 
Correlate
- Authors's Label
 - Sense of community
 - Our Classification
 - 
            
 - 
                        
 - Error Estimates
 - Cronbach's α is .69.
 - Remarks
 - 12-item Sense of Community Index (Perkins, Florin, Rich, Wandersman, & Chavis, 1990) was used to measure sense of community. The sum scores ranged from 19 to 58, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of sense of community.
 - Distribution
 - M: 40.65, SD: 5.40
 - Operationalization
 - 1. I think my [block] is a good place for me to live.
2. People on this [block] do not share the same values.
3. My [neighbors] and I want the same things from the [block].
4. I can recognize most of the people who live on my [block].
5. I feel at home on this [block].
6. Very few of my [neighbors] know me.
7. I care about what my [neighbors] think of my actions.
8. I have no influence over what this [block] is like.
9. If there is a problem on this [block] people who live here can get it solved.
10. It is very important to me to live on this particular [block].
11. People on this [block] generally don’t get along with each other.
12. I expect to live on this [block] for a long time.
1: True
0: False 
Observed Relation with Happiness
- Age of migration
- Sexe
- Married
- Family oriented migration
- Living with children
- Number of friends
- Education
- Income
- Health insurance
- ADL difficulties
- IADL difficulties
- Years in the United States
- Level of acculturation