Study Shapiro & Lambert (1999): study US 1987
- Public
- Fathers of child below age 19, USA, followed 5 years 1987 - 1994
- Survey name
- US-NSFH combined waves
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 844
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- T1 value of happiness
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Coresidence = living with child
- Distribution
-
T1:
Divorced coresident M = 5.35 (1.26)
Divorced nonresident M = 5.08 (1.30)
Continuously married M = 5.57 (1.17)
T2:
Divorced coresident M = 4.56 (1.94)
Divorced nonresident M = 5.27 (1.25)
Continuously married M = 5.36 (1.22) - Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- T1 happiness by T2 happiness: 5 year diference
Taking all things together, how would you say things are these days?
1 very unhappy
2
3
4
5
6
7 very happy
Observed Relation with Happiness
b (+.276) controled for:
- Recently divorced
- Personal characteristics
- age
- income (logged)
- education
- Ethnicity
- first marriage
- number of children
- Focal child characteristics
- Male
- age
- T1-T2 CHANGE in father-child relationship
b (+.344) controled for:
- Living with child
- Personal characteristics
- age
- income (logged)
- education
- Ethnicity
- first marriage
- number of children
- months separated
- relationship with ex-spouse
- Focal child characteristics
- Male
- age
- Father-child relationship at T1