Study Shapiro & Lambert (1999): study US 1987
- Public
 - Fathers of child below age 19, USA, followed 5 years 1987 - 1994
 - Survey name
 - US-NSFH combined waves
 - Sample
 - Respondents
 - N = 844
 - Non Response
 - Assessment
 - Interview: face-to-face
 
Correlate
- Authors's Label
 - T1 value of happiness
 - Our Classification
 - 
            
 - 
                        
 - Remarks
 - Coresidence = living with child
 - Distribution
 - 
                T1:
Divorced coresident M = 5.35 (1.26)
Divorced nonresident M = 5.08 (1.30)
Continuously married M = 5.57 (1.17)
T2:
Divorced coresident M = 4.56 (1.94)
Divorced nonresident M = 5.27 (1.25)
Continuously married M = 5.36 (1.22) - Related specification variables
 - 
                
 - 
                            
 - Operationalization
 - T1 happiness by T2 happiness: 5 year diference
Taking all things together, how would you say things are these days?
1 very unhappy
2
3
4
5
6
7 very happy 
Observed Relation with Happiness
b (+.276) controled for:
- Recently divorced
- Personal characteristics
- age
- income (logged)
- education
- Ethnicity
- first marriage
- number of children
- Focal child characteristics
- Male
- age
- T1-T2 CHANGE in father-child relationship
b (+.344) controled for:
- Living with child
- Personal characteristics
- age
- income (logged)
- education
- Ethnicity
- first marriage
- number of children
- months separated
- relationship with ex-spouse
- Focal child characteristics
- Male
- age
- Father-child relationship at T1