print

Correlational findings

Study Shapiro & Lambert (1999): study US 1987

Public
Fathers of child below age 19, USA, followed 5 years 1987 - 1994
Survey name
US-NSFH combined waves
Sample
Respondents
N = 844
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
T1 value of happiness
Our Classification
Remarks
Coresidence = living with child
Distribution
T1:
Divorced coresident    M = 5.35 (1.26)
Divorced nonresident M = 5.08 (1.30)
Continuously married M = 5.57 (1.17)

T2:
Divorced coresident    M = 4.56 (1.94)
Divorced nonresident M = 5.27 (1.25)
Continuously married M = 5.36 (1.22)
Related specification variables
Operationalization
T1 happiness by T2 happiness: 5 year diference
Taking all things together, how would you say things are these days?
1  very unhappy
2
3
4
5
6
7  very happy

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-c-sq-n-7-b b = +.28 p < .001 ALL FATHERS at T2
b (+.276) controled for:
- Recently divorced
- Personal characteristics
  - age
  - income (logged)
  - education
  - Ethnicity
  - first marriage
  - number of children
- Focal child characteristics
  - Male
  - age
- T1-T2 CHANGE in father-child relationship
O-HL-c-sq-n-7-b b = +.34 p < .05 RECENTLY DIVORCED FATHERS at T2 Only
b (+.344) controled for:
- Living with child
- Personal characteristics
  - age
  - income (logged)
  - education
  - Ethnicity
  - first marriage
  - number of children
  - months separated
  - relationship with ex-spouse
- Focal child characteristics
  - Male
  - age
- Father-child relationship at T1