Study Gray et al. (2008a): study TH Thailand North 2005
- Public
- + 20 aged, Chai Nai and Kanchnaburi provinces, Thailand, 2005
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 5360
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Income
- Our Classification
-
-
- Distribution
-
Chainat: 1: 44,1%, 2: 10,9%, 3: 17,6%, 4: 12,7%, 5: 14,7%
Kanchnaburi 1: 36,9%, 2: 10,3%, 3: 24,0%, 4: 16,0%, 5: 12,9% - Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- Income in 1000 Baht
1: no income (ref)
2: 20 and less
3: 20-50
4: 50-100
5: 100+
Observed Relation with Happiness
no income M = 5,7 SD = 2,0
>20 M = 5,3 SD = 2,0
20-50 M = 5,7 SD = 1,7
50-100 M = 5,8 SD = 1,8
<100+ M = 6,4 SD = 1,7
20-50 (vs none) b = +.07 (ns)
50-100 (vs none) b = +.05 (ns)
<100+ (vs none) b = +.30 (05)
no income M = 5,8 SD = 1,8
>20 M = 5,0 SD = 1,9
20-50 M = 5,6 SD = 1,7
50-100 M = 5,9 SD = 1,7
<100+ M = 6,2 SD = 1,6
20-50 (vs none) b = -.12 (ns)
50-100 (vs none) b = +.05 (ns)
<100+ (vs none) b = +.15 (ns)
b's controlled for:
- age
- gender
- marital status
- education
- debts
- house ownership
- perceived neighbourhood quality
- sickness last month
- feeling of relative poverty