print

Correlational findings

Study Abbott & Sapsford (2006): study UA 2001

Public
18+ aged general public, Ukraine, 2001
Survey name
LLH Survey
Sample
Respondents
N = 2500
Non Response
24%
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Amenities
Our Classification
Operationalization
Factor of access to:
a) cold water
b) hot water
c) WC
d) bathroom
e) kitchen

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-c-sq-v-4-ga r = -.11 p < .01 O-HL-c-sq-v-4-ga Beta = -.06 p < .01 O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c r = +.08 p < .01 O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = ? ns Betas controlled for:
- age
- gender
- education
- employed
- economic situation
- basic food
- married
- social resource Index
- personal support Index
- Friend to confide in
- Trust people
- Trust government
- trust institutions
- active in organization
- Personal control scale
- Freedom of choice and control
- Freedom Index O-HL-c-sq-v-4-ga Beta = -.06 p < .01 O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = ? ns Betas additionally controlled for:
- Self reported Health
- psycho-social health scale
- limiting long-term health problem O-HL-c-sq-v-4-ga Beta = -.05 p < .05 O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = ? ns Betas additionally controlled for satisfaction with:
- security level
- work
- work conditions
- personal income
- household income
- health
- political system

Signs in report are based on correlation with UNhappiness/DISsatisfaction. Reversed by WDH team to fit standard notation of correlation with more happiness.