print

Correlational findings

Study Rukumnuaykit & Pholphirul (2016): study TH 2005

Public
15+ aged rural living, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand, 2005
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 2864
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Community-level social capital
Our Classification
Operationalization
Percentage of households in a village:
a Not experiencing any crime in the previous month
b Participating in a public hearing
c Engaging in activities that are beneficial to the public
d Sacrificing time/energy to helo others
e Trusting other people when lending things

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m DM = + O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m r = -.13 ns O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = -.01 p < .10 Not experiencing any crime in the previous month (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = -.01 p < .01 Participating in a public hearing (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m r = -.29 ns O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.00 ns Engaging in activities that are beneficial to the public (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m r = -.23 ns O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.01 ns Sacrificing time/energy to help others (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m r = +.05 ns O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = -.00 ns Trusting other people when lending things (vs not)

b values controled for:
- Gender
- Marital status
- Age
- Health
- Income
- Household living condition
- Community living condition
- Individual-level social capital
- Community-level social capital O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m r = -.06 ns