print

Correlational findings

Study Rukumnuaykit & Pholphirul (2016): study TH 2005

Public:
15+ aged rural living, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand, 2005
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 2864
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Individual-level social capital
Our Classification
Operationalization
a Knowing well others living in the same community
b Sacrificing time/energy to helping others
c Trusting other people when lending things
d Having no anxiety about security problems in a community
e Participating in a public hearing
f Not experiencing any crime in the previous months
g Engaging in activities that are beneficial to the public

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m DM = + O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = -.00 ns Knowing with others living in the same community (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = -.02 ns Sacrificing time/energy to helping others (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.24 p < .05 Trusting other people when lending things (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.13 ns Having no anxiety about security problems in a community (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.16 p < .10 Participating in a public hearing (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.25 p < .10 Not experiencing any crime in the previous months (vs not) O-HL-u-sq-n-11-m b = +.05 ns Engaging in activities that are beneficial to the public (vs not)

b values controled for:
- Gender
- Marital status
- Age
- Health
- Income
- Household living condition
- Community living condition
- Individual-level social capital
- Community-level social capital