print

Correlational findings

Study Han (2015): study CN 2009

Public:
18-70 aged general public, China, 2009
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 2866
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Social trust
Our Classification
Distribution
1a)
Urban: Mean (SD) = 0.39 (.49)
Rural: Mean (SD) = 0.35 (.48)

1b)
Urban: Mean (SD) = 0.33 (.47)
Rural: Mean (SD) = 0.25 (.43)
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Self report on question about people can be trusted or not:
1 Not
a) I need to be wary of most people
b) hard to say it depends
0 Must people can be trusted (reference)

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-cm-sq-v-4-a b = -.05 ns 1a No social trust
0 Most people can be trusted

Urban sample
M-FH-cm-sq-v-4-a b = -.17 p < .001 1a No social trust
0 Most people can be trusted

Rural sample
M-FH-cm-sq-v-4-a b = +.02 ns 1b Social trust hard to say
0 Most people can be trusted

Urban sample
M-FH-cm-sq-v-4-a b = -.15 p < .01 1b Social trust hard to say
0 Most people can be trusted

Rural sample