print

Correlational findings

Study Han (2015): study CN 2009

Public:
18-70 aged general public, China, 2009
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 2866
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Assessment of social protection
Our Classification
Distribution
Urban: Mean (SD) = 3.42 (.71)
Rural: Mean (SD) = 3.43 (.73)
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Self report on 3 questions about goverment´s performance in:
a) health care
b) primary and secondary education
c) old age support
Rates: 1 = very bad; 5 = very good

Computation of index: (a+b+c)/3

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-cm-sq-v-4-a b = .10 p < .05 Urban sample M-FH-cm-sq-v-4-a b = +.08 p < .01 Rural sample

b controled for:
- personal characteristics
- education
- gender
- age
- marital status
- political orientation
- household size
- health
- income
- societal evaluation variables
- social comparison
- life goals
- inequality variables
- trust variables