print

Correlational findings

Study Wright & Cropanzano (2000): study US 1997

Public:
Human services workers, United States, 1997
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 47
Non Response:
Assessment:
Multiple assesment methods
questionnaire and rating by supervisor

Correlate

Authors's Label
Job performance
Our Classification
Remarks
Wright & Bonett, 1993; Wright et al., 1993
Distribution
M = 4.1; SD = 0.7
Operationalization
Rating by supervision based on 1 question:
-"Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance over the past year?"
Rated:
1 poor
:
5 excellent

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BB-g-mq-v-3-a r = +.32 p < .05 A-BB-g-mq-v-3-a Beta = +.19 p < .01 Beta controlled for
- age
- gender
- tenure
- job satisfaction
A-BB-g-mq-v-3-a = +.15 p < .01 Added explained variance in job performance after
- age
- gender
- job satisfaction
- tenure