print

Correlational findings

Study Zelenski et al. (2008): study CA 2005

Public
Directors, Canada, followed 8 weeks, 2005
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 715
Non Response
43%
Assessment
Questionnaire: web

Correlate

Authors's Label
Productivity at work
Our Classification
Distribution
M = 3.32; SD = 0.45
Operationalization
Selfreport on 1 question, "How productive were you in your work role?" Participants were asked to answer the question twice a week for 8 weeks.
Rated :
1 not very productive
:
5 exceptionally productive

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BW-g-mq-v-5-g r = + Baseline happines by productivity in next 8 weeks

- positive affect: r = +.33 (01)
- negative affect: r = -.19 (ns)
Correlation with affect balance not reported, but must be positive, significance unsure
A-BW-g-mq-v-5-g Beta = + - positive affect: beta = +.28 (05)
- negative affect: beta = -.07 (ns)
Correlations with affect balance not reported, but must be positive, significance unsure

Betas controlled for baseline:
- job satisfaction
- quality of work-life
- life satisfaction