print

Correlational findings

Study Lee et al. (2022): study KR Kyeonggi/Gyeonggi Do 2016

Public:
19+ aged, Gyeonggi-do region, South Korea, 2016
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 42000
Non Response:
Assessment:
Multiple assesment methods
using telephone and email, face-to -face survey done by trained surveyors

Correlate

Authors's Label
Amenity Satisfaction
Our Classification
Distribution
Mean: a.2.71, b.2.9, c. 2.91, d.2.9, e. 3.12, f.2.98,
average: 2.913
Operationalization
Selfreport on 5 questions
a. I am satisfied with the cultural space of our district
b. I am satisfied with the neighborhood facilities in our district
c. I am satisfied with the public institutions in our district
d. I am satisfied with the welfare facilities in our district
e. I am satisfied with my medical institution
f. I am satisfied with my local market
Rated
4
:
1:
Scale labels not reported

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-AO-*-mq-v-4-c Beta = +.22 p < .05 Beta controled for:
- satisfaction with local
  - parking
  - trafic safety
- local social cohesion
  - sense of comminity  
  - neighbouring
- citizen participation
- Housing
  - lives in appartment (vs separate house)
  - owns house
  - residence period, resedence period squared
- socio-economic characteristics
  - age
  - gender
  - edication
  - income
  - employment