Study Lee et al. (2022): study KR Kyeonggi/Gyeonggi Do 2016

Public

19+ aged, Gyeonggi-do region, South Korea, 2016

Survey name

Unnamed study

Sample

Respondents

N = 42000

Non Response

Assessment

Multiple assesment methods
using telephone and email, face-to -face survey done by trained surveyors

Correlate

Authors's Label

Amenity Satisfaction

Our Classification

Distribution

Mean: a.2.71, b.2.9, c. 2.91, d.2.9, e. 3.12, f.2.98,
average: 2.913

Operationalization

Selfreport on 5 questions
a. I am satisfied with the cultural space of our district
b. I am satisfied with the neighborhood facilities in our district
c. I am satisfied with the public institutions in our district
d. I am satisfied with the welfare facilities in our district
e. I am satisfied with my medical institution
f. I am satisfied with my local market
Rated
4
:
1:
Scale labels not reported

Observed Relation with Happiness