print

Correlational findings

Study Miner & Glomb (2010): study US 2017

Public
Employees, United States, 2017
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 67
Non Response
38%
Assessment
Experience sampling

Correlate

Authors's Label
Service quality
Our Classification
Distribution
M = 0.02; SD = 0.56
Operationalization
Measured with two items:
a. Customer rated quality of service: customers were asked to rate the level of service they received and their satisfaction with the employee they spoke to on their call;
rating scale not reported

b. Self-evaluation of quality of service: Participants rated the quality of service they had provided over the past 30 min.
Participants answered on a 5-point response scale anchored by "far above my personal average" and "far below my personal average".

Rating scale not reported

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-ARE-m-mqr-nv-4-a r = +.18 ns