print

Correlational findings

Study Dingemans & Henkens (2014): study NL 2001

Public
50-64 aged, Netherlands, followed before and after retirement, 2001-2011
Survey name
NL-NIDI work and retirement panel
Sample
Respondents
N = 1248
Non Response
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Marital status change
Our Classification
Remarks
Happiness assessed atAssessed at T1: 2001 T2: 2006/7 T3: 2011 Most participants retired in this period
Distribution
pooled means and SD in postretirement.
(a) M=0.82, SD=0.38
(b) M=0.11, SD=0.31
(c) M=0.05, SD=0.21
(d) M=0.02, SD=0.15
Operationalization
(a) constantly living with a partner (reference)
(b) constanly single
(c) loss of a partner
(d) new partner

1: yes
0:no

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-CO-u-mq-v-5-b b = -.15 p < .01 Postretirement happiness CHANGE by being CONSTANTLY single (vs constantly living with partner). M-CO-u-mq-v-5-b b = -.12 ns Postretirement happiness CHANGE by LOSS of a partner (vs constantly living with partner). M-CO-u-mq-v-5-b b = +.14 ns Postretirement happiness CHANGE by had a NEW partner (vs constantly living with partner).

All b controlled for:
Personal characteristics
- preretirement happiness(to capture change)
- time of retirement in survey wave
- age
- gender
- change of health problem
- perceived pension shortfall
Household composition
- had children
Preretirement work context
- job satisfaction
- supervisor
- occupation level
- years of retirement
Retirement transition
- reasons for involuntariness
- bridge employment status
- bridge job in the past
- motives for bridge employment