print

Correlational findings

Study Grogan & Summerfield (2014): study RU 2006

Public
46-59 aged women and 51-64 aged men, Russia, followed 5 years, 2006-2011
Survey name
RU-RLMS combined waves
Sample
Respondents
N = 12466
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Age
Our Classification
Remarks
5 years follow-up data from 2006-2011(T1-T6),
Related specification variables
Operationalization
A age in years
B age squared

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h b-fix = +.01 ns T1-T6 Happiness CHANGE by age
- women O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h b-fix = -.02 ns - men

b-fix controlled for:
- individual fixed effects, with robust standard error
- pension recipient
- age squared
- survey year O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h b-fix = +.00 ns T1-T6 Happiness CHANGE by age square
- women O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h b-fix = -.00 ns - men

b-fix controlled for:
- individual fixed effects, with robust standard error
- pension recipient
- age
- survey year O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h OPRC = -.01 ns T1-T6 Happiness CHANGE by age
- women O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h OPRC = -.42 p < .10 - men

OPRC controlled for:
- local fixed effect with clustered standard errors, but not individual fixed effects
- pension recipient
- age square
- year O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h OPRC = +.00 ns T1-T6 Happiness CHANGE by age square
- women O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-h OPRC = +.00 p < .05 - men

OPRC controlled for:
- local fixed effect with clustered standard errors, but not individual fixed effects
- age
- pension recipient
- survey year