print

Correlational findings

Study Auma (2015): study NL Rotterdam 2009

Public
General public, 67 neighborhoods, Rotterdam Netherlanfs 2009
Survey name
NL-Rotterdam Leisure Survey 2009
Sample
Respondents
N = 67
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Public transport indicators
Our Classification
Remarks
Data provided by local public transportation company RET
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Combined directions,platforms,visits and waiting time of
a: bus,
b: metro
c: tram .

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-?-sq-v-4-a OPRC = -.09 p < .05 AVERAGE happines in neighorhood by public transport amenities in neighourhood

BUS
- directions   +.09 (05)
- platforms    -.01 (ns)
- visits       -.01 (01)
- waiting time -.18 (05)
O-HL-?-sq-v-4-a OPRC = METRO
- directions   +.06 (ns)
- platforms    -.01 (ns)
- visits       -.01 (10)
- waiting time -.02 (ns)
O-HL-?-sq-v-4-a OPRC = TRAM
- directions   -.03 (ns)
- platforms    -.02 (ns)
- visits       -.01 (10)
- waiting time -.10 (05)

OPRCs controled for neighbourhood
- % employed
- average income

Similar for Dutch and Non-Dutch residents