print

Correlational findings

Study Hart et al. (2018): study ZZ Europe 2014

Public
18+ aged, urban areas, European countries, 2014
Survey name
INT-SPOTLIGHT survey
Sample
Respondents
N = 5205
Non Response
89.2%
Assessment
Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Local social cohesion
Our Classification
Remarks
13 questionnaire by Beenackers et al 2013
Distribution
Range: 13.33-19.75; M =17.36+-1.54
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Average response to question on perceived social cohesion in vinicity
Question not reported

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = + p < .01 Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             1,31   [1,19;1,44]
- moderately happy       1.22   [1,10;1,35]
- neutral                1,08   [0.98;1,19]
- unhappy (reference)

ORO controled for:
- age
- gender
- children in household
- education
- employment
- region of residence

ORO similar across
- age
- gender
- children in household
- education
- employment
- region of residence
- amount of leisure time spend in neighourhood